(no title)
ryanmcl | 3 days ago
I'm curious whether the generated language actually makes Claude produce better/more reliable outputs when writing in it, or if it just reflects Claude's training bias toward what "good language design" looks like in its corpus. Would be a fascinating benchmark to run.
presbyterian|3 days ago
With the large difference that painters actually paint and use the brush, they don't just algorithmically regurgitate paintings they've been shown.
fcatalan|3 days ago
I find that it's able to produce working code in the generated language just from the README and the previous examples without much trouble. And I've seen the strict typing help it catch and correct bugs quickly. I steer it very little. The only thing I keep an eye on is not allowing it to cheat about things like writing lots of concrete functionality in the host language and then just calling that from the interpreter.
dev_l1x_be|3 days ago
fcatalan|3 days ago