top | item 47172238

Show HN: Unfucked - version all changes (by any tool) - local-first/source avail

133 points| cyrusradfar | 3 days ago |unfudged.io

I built unf after I pasted a prompt into the wrong agent terminal and it overwrote hours of hand-edits across a handful of files. Git couldn't help because I hadn't finished/committed my in progress work. I wanted something that recorded every save automatically so I could rewind to any point in time. I wanted to make it difficult for an agent to permanently screw anything up, even with an errant rm -rf

unf is a background daemon that watches directories you choose (via CLI) and snapshots every text file on save. It stores file contents in an object store, tracks metadata in SQLite, and gives you a CLI to query and restore any version. The install includes a UI, as well to explore the history through time.

The tool skips binaries and respects `.gitignore` if one exists. The interface borrows from git so it should feel familiar: unf log, unf diff, unf restore.

I say "UN-EF" vs U.N.F, but that's for y'all to decide: I started by calling the project Unfucked and got unfucked.ai, which if you know me and the messes I get myself into, is a fitting purchase.

The CLI command is `unf` and the Tauri desktop app is titled "Unfudged" (kids safe name).

How it works: https://unfucked.ai/tech (summary below)

The daemon uses FSEvents on macOS and inotify on Linux. When a file changes, `unf` hashes the content with BLAKE3 and checks whether that hash already exists in the object store — if it does, it just records a new metadata entry pointing to the existing blob. If not, it writes the blob and records the entry. Each snapshot is a row in SQLite. Restores read the blob back from the object store and overwrite the file, after taking a safety snapshot of the current state first (so restoring is itself reversible).

There are two processes. The core daemon does the real work of managing FSEvents/inotify subscriptions across multiple watched directories and writing snapshots. A sentinel watchdog supervises it, kept alive and aligned by launchd on macOS and systemd on Linux. If the daemon crashes, the sentinel respawns it and reconciles any drift between what you asked to watch and what's actually being watched. It was hard to build the second daemon because it felt like conceding that the core wasn't solid enough, but I didn't want to ship a tool that demanded perfection to deliver on the product promise, so the sentinel is the safety net.

Fingers crossed, I haven’t seen it crash in over a week of personal usage on my Mac. But, I don't want to trigger "works for me" trauma.

The part I like most: On the UI, I enjoy viewing files through time. You can select a time section and filter your projects on a histogram of activity. That has been invaluable in seeing what the agent was doing.

On the CLI, the commands are composable. Everything outputs to stdout so you can pipe it into whatever you want. I use these regularly and AI agents are better with the tool than I am:

  # What did my config look like before we broke it?
  unf cat nginx.conf --at 1h | nginx -t -c /dev/stdin

  # Grep through a deleted file
  unf cat old-routes.rs --at 2d | grep "pub fn"

  # Count how many lines changed in the last 10 minutes
  unf diff --at 10m | grep '^[+-]' | wc -l

  # Feed the last hour of changes to an AI for review
  unf diff --at 1h | pbcopy

  # Compare two points in time with your own diff tool
  diff <(unf cat app.tsx --at 1h) <(unf cat app.tsx --at 5m)

  # Restore just the .rs files that changed in the last 5 minutes
  unf diff --at 5m --json | jq -r '.changes[].file' | grep '\.rs$' | xargs -I{} unf restore {} --at 5m

  # Watch for changes in real time
  watch -n5 'unf diff --at 30s'
What was new for me: I came to Rust in Nov. 2025 honestly because of HN enthusiasm and some FOMO. No regrets. I enjoy the language enough that I'm now working on custom clippy lints to enforce functional programming practices. This project was also my first Apple-notarized DMG, my first Homebrew tap, and my second Tauri app (first one I've shared).

Install & Usage:

  > brew install cyrusradfar/unf/unfudged
Then unf watch in a directory. unf help covers the details (or ask your agent to coach).

EDIT: Folks are asking for the source, if you're interested watch https://github.com/cyrusradfar/homebrew-unf -- I'll migrate there if you want it.

83 comments

order

notfried|2 days ago

I love the website; the design, the video, the NSFW toggle, the simplicity.

I love the idea; definitely something I ran into a few times before and wish I had.

Unfortunately, I am not installing a closed-source daemon with access to the filesystem from an unknown (to me) developer. I will bookmark this and revisit in a few weeks and hope you had published the source. :)

popalchemist|2 days ago

Agreed on all counts. It looks great! Just can't trust it unless it's transparent.

wazzaps|2 days ago

FYI all Jetbrains IDEs include this, as long as they are open on the codebase. It's called "Local history".

its-kostya|2 days ago

I love to use the terminal, and I still do. But as much as I love to unfu*k my local nvim setup, I much rather pay a company to do it for me. Set up vim bindings inside jetbrains and everything comes with batteries included, along with a kick-ass debugger. While my colleagues are fighting opencode, I pointed my IDE at the correct MCP gateway and everything "just works" with more context.

Thought I'd share the data point to support jetbrains

gschrader|2 days ago

I think it only keeps history for user edited files, agent edited files don't seem to end up in it for me (Claude code) but maybe it works with other agents with the proper plugins I'm not sure.

heeen2|2 days ago

vscode and its forks as well (for files it saves)

mpalmer|2 days ago

This is so cool to have made yourself. How would you compare this to the functionality offered by jujutsu? I love the histogram, it was the first sort of thing I wanted out of jujutsu that its UI doesn't make very easy. But with jj the filesystem tracking is built in, which is a huge advantage.

cyrusradfar|2 days ago

I'm not a user, but I looked at the site and it looks like jj snapshots when you run a jj command. UNF snapshots continuously.

If an AI agent rewrites 30 files and you haven't touched jj yet, jj has the before-state but none of the intermediate states. UNF* captured every save as it happened, at filesystem level.

jj is a VCS. UNF is a safety net that sits below your VCS.

  - UNF* works alongside git, jj, or no VCS at all
  
  - No workflow change. You don't adopt a new tool, it just runs in the background
  
  - Works on files outside any repo (configs, scratch dirs, notes) as it doesn't require git.
They're complementary, not competing.

W.r.t. to the histogram, this is my fav feature of the app as well. Session segmentation (still definitely not perfect) creates selectable regions to make it easier, too. The algo is in the CLI as well for the Agent recap (rebuilding context) features.

benoitg|1 day ago

One of the uses cases on their website is the agent deleted my .env file.

jj wouldn’t help with that as it would be gitignored.

ghrl|22 hours ago

This tool seems very promising and does solve a real issue I've certainly had quite a few times already where this would have been very useful.

I really like the website design and content-wise, as well as the detailed writeup here on HN. Certainly impressive work for an individual.

I've never used Time Machine but I do have kopia set up for frequent backups of important places, like the entire Documents folder. It does use a CAS as well and last time/size/hashes for determining what to save.

Coming from that I'm curious about a few aspects. Would this work well for larger folders/files? You mentioned deduplication, but does that happen on the file level or on chunks of the file, so that small changes don't store an entire new version of the file? Additionally, are the stored files compressed somehow, probably a fast compression algorithm? I think that could make it work for more than just source code.

Great project though, so far. I could see it becoming a lot more popular given an open source code base. Maybe a pricing model like the one Mac Mouse Fix uses would work, being open source and charging a fee so small it still reaches a large audience. That would likely be fair considering the developer time/agent cost of just a single unf'd problem as ROI.

gavinray|1 day ago

In today's version of "LLM's allow a person to write thousands of lines of code to replace built-in Unix tools":

  inotifywait -mr -e modify,create,delete /your/dir |
  while read _; do
    cd /your/dir && git add -A && git commit -m "auto-$(date +%s)" --allow-empty
  done
There are +8 billion people on the planet, computing has beed around a while now and some REALLY smart people have published tools for computers. Ask yourself, "am I the first person to try to solve this problem?"

Odds are, one or more people have had this problem in the past and there's probably a nifty solution that does what you want.

cyrusradfar|1 day ago

OP Here, hard to attempt to read and respond to this in good faith.

I think it would be dishonest if I didn't share that your approach to discourse here isn't a productive way of asking what insights I'm bringing.

If that's your concern, I agree I can't claim that nothing exists to solve pieces of the puzzle in different ways. I did my research and was happy that I could get a domain that explained the struggle -- namely unfucked.ai/unfudged.io -- moreover I do feel there are many pieces and nuances to the experience which give pause to folks who create versioning tools.

I'm open to engaging if you have a question or comment that doesn't diminish my motives, assumes I must operate in your world view "problems can only be solved once", and discourages people to try new things and learn.

Look, I'm grateful that you stopped by and hope you'll recognize I'm doing my best to manage my own sadness that my children have to exist in a world where folks think this is how we should address strangers.

amadeuspagel|1 day ago

Only works in a git directory, and one might want to use git only for manual version control and another tool for automatic.

oftenwrong|1 day ago

I have used savevers.vim for many years as a way to recover old versions of files.

https://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=89

It is comparatively unsophisticated, but I need it so infrequently that it has been good enough.

I do like the idea of maintaining a complete snapshot of all history.

This is a good application for virtual filesystems. The virtual fs would capture every write in order to maintain a complete edit history. As I understand it, Google's CitC system and Meta's EdenFS work this way.

https://cacm.acm.org/research/why-google-stores-billions-of-...

https://github.com/facebook/sapling/blob/main/eden/fs/docs/O...

mplanck|2 days ago

Yep, I’ve needed something like this a few times. Even when trying to be careful to commit every step to a feature branch, I’ve still found myself asking for code fixes or updates in a single iteration and kicking myself when I didn’t just commit the damn thing. This will be a nice safety net.

cyrusradfar|2 days ago

Thank you! That's great to hear.

I spent a bit of time being baffled nothing existed that does this. Then I realized that, until Agents, the velocity of changes wasn't as quick and errors were rare(er)

rishabhaiover|2 days ago

haha the NSFW toggle is crazy

cyrusradfar|2 days ago

Ha, the only feedback I needed :) I spent far too much time on the Unicorn exploding properly...

ifh-hn|2 days ago

I have used fossil in a similar way, also local, and sqlite based. Admittedly you have to add files to it first but setting it running via cron was simple enough. Though it wasn't be ause I let an AI access all my stuff.

dpe82|1 day ago

ZFS snapshots can be used to similar effect, basically for free.

jona-f|1 day ago

Or btrfs for that matter. I'm doing something similar with btrfs. Used zfs for a while, but the external repositories kept getting out of sync with the distribtion kernel, so system updates required manual intervention. That annoyed the heck out of me over time. Switched back to btrfs, which has been working fine for the last year. 10 or so years earlier I still had data corruption and bugs with btrfs.

dataflow|1 day ago

Don't change-notification-based mechanisms suffer from potentially reading a half-written file? Or do you do something more clever?

cyrusradfar|1 day ago

There's a 3-second debounce. Don't hold me to that timeframe, that's the default now.

It doesn't read the file the instant the OS fires the event. It accumulates events and waits for 3 seconds of silence before reading. So if an editor does write-tmp → rename (atomic save), or a tool writes in chunks, we only read after the dust settles.

I accept there are cases if the editor crashes mid-state that you have a corrupted state but there was never a good state to save, so, arguably you'd just restore to what's on file and remove the corrupt partial write.

It's not bulletproof against a program that holds a file open and writes to it continuously for more than 3 seconds, but in practice that doesn't happen with text files by Agent tools or IDEs.

Feel free to follow up for clarity.

s0a|3 days ago

this seems insanely useful and well thought out. kinda surprised something like it doesn’t already exist. def useful in the age of agents

teo_zero|1 day ago

Excellent idea. Looking forward to trying it. Any way to install it without brew?

cyrusradfar|1 day ago

what's your hardware/os?

sourcegrift|1 day ago

I use zfs 15-minute snapshot for this. Nixos+zfs makes this too easy

pasc1878|1 day ago

If this is on Homebrew then it is on macOS.

Why not just use TRime Machine?

otterley|1 day ago

The article explains that.

atmanactive|1 day ago

This would be great as aVSCode(ium) extension.

cyrusradfar|1 day ago

OP here --

I could build an extension for the UI vs a Tauri app, and it could help you install the CLI if you don't have it. Would that meet your needs?

That said, the fidelity of OS-level daemon can't really be replicated from within an app process.

mellosouls|1 day ago

Great idea, terrible name. Honestly this sort of stuff reinforces the idea tech types lack social skills and maturity. NB I'm fine with vulgarity in its place (UK Viz reader here), but potentially professional tools isn't that place. Edit: I notice the blueness seems to have been deprecated in naming.

+1 for the open source comments.

In your examples the framing of use cases against agent screw-ups is contemporary and well-chosen.

Best of luck with the project as you make it more useable.

imiric|1 day ago

This is not something I would ever use. The idea of giving a probabilistic model the permission to run commands with full access to my filesystem, and at the very least not reviewing and approving everything it does, is bonkers to me.

But I'm amused by the people asking for the source code. You trust a tool from a giant corporation with not only your local data, but with all your data on external services as well, yet trusting a single developer with a fraction of this is a concern? (:

urbandw311er|1 day ago

I don’t think that’s as crazy as you do. Corporations are supposed to have checks and balances in place, safeguards, policies. Individuals might have none of these.

bananapub|2 days ago

why did you make it so complicated? magit has a `magit-wip-mode` that just silently creates refs in git intermittently so you can just use the reflog to get things back.

cyrusradfar|2 days ago

This was designed for any file save.

From what I know (correct me) magit-wip-mode hooks into editor saves. UNF hooks into the filesystem.

magit-wip-mode is great if your only risk is your own edits in Emacs. UNF* exists because that's no longer the only risk; agents are rewriting codebases/docs and they don't use Emacs.

mrorigo|1 day ago

Why not just fuckin commit!?

8n4vidtmkvmk|1 day ago

You end up with a lot of small dumb commits, and you have to do so manually between nearly every LLM interaction.

I do this but i certainly see the appeal of something better

schainks|1 day ago

So this is Time Machine, but with extra steps? </s>

cyrusradfar|1 day ago

Op here - grateful you gave it a look but want to clarify TM can’t be used for this use case.

UNF is one install command + unf watch to protect a repo on every file change, takes 30s.

Time Machine snapshots hourly, not on every change, so you can lose real work between snapshots. This may have changed or I missed something but I reviewed that app to see if it was possible.

And while tmutil exists, it wasn’t designed to be invoked mid-workflow by an agent. UNF* captures every write and is built to be part of the recovery loop

OutOfHere|2 days ago

[deleted]

cyrusradfar|2 days ago

Appreciate that perspective and assumed some folks would feel that way.

I am more interested in testing if folks have the problem and like the shape of the solution, before I try to decide on the model to sustain it. Open Source to me is saying -- "hey do you all want to help me build this?"

I'm not even at the point of knowing if it should exist, so why start asking people to help without that validation.

I work(ed) with OSS projects that have terrible times sustaining themselves and don't default to it bc of that trauma.

Thanks for stopping by.