top | item 47177692 (no title) pluto_modadic | 3 days ago OsmAnd still hasn't fixed utah addresses. If I enter in how we call addresses in local slang, it has no idea how to find it. discuss order hn newest pferde|3 days ago Start fixing it in Openstreetmap yourself, or even better, get in touch with active OSM mappers in Utah, and talk to them about this.OsmAnd merely makes use of the data from OSM. gpvos|2 days ago Is it an OSM or OsmAnd issue? Does it work on osm.org? SahAssar|2 days ago I'm not sure if supporting local slang formats for addresses should be very high on the list of priorities. gpvos|2 days ago Assuming "slang" is an exaggeration: the basic principle of OSM is that things are mapped and named as they are on the ground. So local names and naming conventions should work; if they don't, it's a bug. nicman23|3 days ago what the fuck? can you share some examples?
pferde|3 days ago Start fixing it in Openstreetmap yourself, or even better, get in touch with active OSM mappers in Utah, and talk to them about this.OsmAnd merely makes use of the data from OSM.
SahAssar|2 days ago I'm not sure if supporting local slang formats for addresses should be very high on the list of priorities. gpvos|2 days ago Assuming "slang" is an exaggeration: the basic principle of OSM is that things are mapped and named as they are on the ground. So local names and naming conventions should work; if they don't, it's a bug.
gpvos|2 days ago Assuming "slang" is an exaggeration: the basic principle of OSM is that things are mapped and named as they are on the ground. So local names and naming conventions should work; if they don't, it's a bug.
pferde|3 days ago
OsmAnd merely makes use of the data from OSM.
gpvos|2 days ago
SahAssar|2 days ago
gpvos|2 days ago
nicman23|3 days ago