top | item 47180952 (no title) egorfine | 2 days ago Fully agree with you on all points.But again: how do we distinguish between manual code input and sophisticated autocomplete? discuss order hn newest idiotsecant|2 days ago The project is simply saying what they want. If you choose to ignore that for some weird reason congratulations for being a jerk, I guess. egorfine|2 days ago Can you confirm that continuing to use autocomplete in a code base against the policy of the project does make the person a jerk? load replies (1) UqWBcuFx6NV4r|2 days ago [deleted] aboardRat4|2 days ago If it's crap then it's ai. If it's okay, then we pretend that is just sophisticated auto complete. egorfine|2 days ago It's pretty much obvious but the policy specifically argues against it and stands on moral grounds. load replies (1)
idiotsecant|2 days ago The project is simply saying what they want. If you choose to ignore that for some weird reason congratulations for being a jerk, I guess. egorfine|2 days ago Can you confirm that continuing to use autocomplete in a code base against the policy of the project does make the person a jerk? load replies (1)
egorfine|2 days ago Can you confirm that continuing to use autocomplete in a code base against the policy of the project does make the person a jerk? load replies (1)
aboardRat4|2 days ago If it's crap then it's ai. If it's okay, then we pretend that is just sophisticated auto complete. egorfine|2 days ago It's pretty much obvious but the policy specifically argues against it and stands on moral grounds. load replies (1)
egorfine|2 days ago It's pretty much obvious but the policy specifically argues against it and stands on moral grounds. load replies (1)
idiotsecant|2 days ago
egorfine|2 days ago
UqWBcuFx6NV4r|2 days ago
[deleted]
aboardRat4|2 days ago
egorfine|2 days ago