No, it's entirely justified when quality of code matters. They don't want a thousand gallons of unreviewable slop. They want a reasonable amount of code that can be sensibility reviewed.
There are ways to achieve that without a blanket ban, if you read their AI policy it seems more "ethically" motivated. They certainly address this first, with many more words and 7 references.
They do go on to address code quality but it is more of an after thought with 0 references, less words and appears lower down the page.
This is incredibly simple. If a project doesn't want machine generated code, don't force machine generated code into the project. This isn't anything here that warrants multiple paragraphs of freakout.
fartfeatures|2 days ago
They do go on to address code quality but it is more of an after thought with 0 references, less words and appears lower down the page.
The timing is also suspicious, shortly after publication of this report: https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/smartphone-ma... which forecasts declining smartphone sales meaning less devices for this OS to run on.
mftrhu|2 days ago
Why would declining sales of new smartphones have anything to do with PostMarketOS, which only supports phones more than half a decade old?
UqWBcuFx6NV4r|2 days ago
[deleted]
idiotsecant|2 days ago