top | item 47182907

Rydberg atoms detect clear signals from a handheld radio

66 points| Brajeshwar | 2 days ago |phys.org

23 comments

order

jacquesm|6 hours ago

Oh, that's very neat, I can imagine that some future front-end to a SDR will have no antenna at all, just a bunch of solid state.

The abstract of the paper:

"""Coupling a Rydberg vapour medium to both microwave and optical fields enables the benefits of all-optical detection, such as minimal disturbance of the measured field and resilience to very strong signals, since no conventional antenna is required. However, peak sensitivity typically relies on adding a microwave local oscillator, which compromises the all-optical nature of the measurement. Here we introduce an alternative, optical-bias detection, that maintains fully optical operation while achieving high sensitivity. To address laser phase noise, which is critical in this approach, we perform a simultaneous measurement of the noise using a nonlinear process and correct it in real time via data processing. This yields a 35 dB improvement in signal-to-noise ratio compared with the basic method. We demonstrate a sensitivity of 176 nV / cm / sqrt(f Hz) , reliable operation up to 3.5 mV/cm at 13.9 GHz, and quadrature-amplitude modulated data transmission, underlining the ability to detect microwave field quadratures while preserving the unique advantages of all-optical detection."""

Emph. mine, at about -36 dBm that's not super sensitive yet though, but that formula suggests that at lower frequencies it should be a lot more sensitive.

The paper is at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63951-9

fsh|5 hours ago

The abstract is not very clearly written. The 3.5 mV/cm is the maximum detectable field strength before the system starts to saturate. I would be interested how the sensitivity compares to conventional (cryogenic) semiconductor detectors.

rkagerer|7 hours ago

We demonstrated simultaneous reception of neighboring channels with strong isolation between them." This enabled the researchers to monitor numerous radio channels at once, instead of tuning into them individually.

Can anyone elaborate on this? How does a single receiver produce multiple concurrent outputs, and how are they isolated in this context?

jacquesm|6 hours ago

Because all of the signals are superimposed. So if your receiver isn't selective it will show all of them at once and if you then demodulate selective parts of the spectrum by filtering you can isolate the signals individually.

Think of any antenna: it is just a rod or a coil, it may have a specific frequency that it particularly likes because that is a nice fraction of its wavelength or close to its own resonance frequency, but that doesn't mean it isn't going to receive all the other signals to greater or lesser extent as well. The ratio between that one that it likes and the rest is called selectivity. The lower the selectivity the more evenly you will receive all signals at the same time.

Usually receivers have a tuned front-end to get as much of the signal you want and to repress the rest as much as possible but that is optional, you can have a wideband front end just the same.

richk449|1 hour ago

Unlike conventional cars that require expensive safety systems such as air bags and seat belts, the mover3000's top speed of one mile per hour makes it intrinsically safe.

amelius|7 hours ago

I have no clue, but I would guess that they do not have a single atom but rather an entire crystal of them.

peter_retief|6 hours ago

I immediately thought of the old crystal radios and a short search brought up this comparison. While old radios used a natural mineral (galena) to detect radio waves, modern Rydberg radio receivers use a synthetic photonic crystal (often made of silicon or glass) to guide and enhance the radio signal for improved performance.

jacquesm|6 hours ago

That's not the function of the crystal though, it is not optical but 100% electrical and serves to demodulate the signal, not to receive it.

boznz|2 days ago

Interesting, I learnt something new today. My only comment was the noise floor of the simple graph was very high-25dBm which (without having a clue how the physics works and skimming the article) sounds about right for something with no proper RF front-end.

Neywiny|2 days ago

Where do you see -25 dBm noise floor? But chance do you mean a 25 dB SNR?

amelius|8 hours ago

What modulation technique?

hausen|6 hours ago

Considering the mention to Family Radio Service, most likely they're demodulating FM.

m3047|1 hour ago

"The key here is that the radio frequencies used in handheld radios are far from the natural resonances of the atom, so while the atoms can sense the radiation, they don't respond to the frequency modulation on which the audio is encoded,"