[khalic]

I can't believe how many people take the anthropic statement at face value. You need to concentrate on what they are implicitly acknowledging. They will spy on non us citizens. How philanthropic

edit: how about the downvoters give a counterargument instead of trying to bury this comment?

[gip]

The challenge for Americans is: can the political work of defining and protecting our values be outsourced to a company like Anthropic?

Anthropic (and others), whether due to financial/regulatory/competitive, will at some point permit their products to be used for any lawful purpose. Even if they attempt to restrict certain uses today. That arrangement is unlikely to hold.

Americans should vote for the right candidates and elect leaders who will carry and defend their views. I don't think there is any other way.

[Loughla]

I'm not trying to have a cynical hot take, but the political class seems not to offer up any candidates that carry or defend my views and the path to these positions requires funding and resources I will never have access to.

The situation in the United States, right now, seems genuinely hopeless. And I'm certain I'm not the only person who feels this way.

What is there to do besides resign myself to what's coming and try my best to ignore the bullshit?

[MWParkerson]

Pathetic but not unexpected that people are willing to tolerate such a use of AI. However, this is the most principled statement on the military use of AI that a frontier model leadership suite has released. It's also full of "china bad" sentiment that's worth picking over, but in a political and economic paradigm that expects & rewards blatant corruption, this statement still stands out.

[khalic]

It does look good on them, just one day after they accept to drop their AÍ safety net, which is a de facto abdication to the DoD. Their article is just (masterful)damage control