top | item 47183542

(no title)

rhinoceraptor | 3 days ago

How wouldn't this also apply to things like useradd(8) or simply automated user account setup, e.g. like cups, sshd, etc? Do we need to add this to vi for use in vipw on UNIX?

discuss

order

hedora|3 days ago

Worse. Google has to add this to all the machines in their data centers? Imagine the expansion of DevOps BS this will enable:

Vendors will need support stuff like "account holder is 12msec old, and can access adult content". They can even create a special certification for it.

Muromec|3 days ago

So... That was the new market that all the ai-layoffs have freed the much needed labor for

p0w3n3d|3 days ago

Imagine unattended installations... Which stop to ask you for the age

beej71|3 days ago

All good questions the legislators had no idea even existed.

ewzimm|3 days ago

useradd has the Other category at setup. Could you argue that anything which allows arbitrary text information to be input into a user account that could be passed on to other applications technically fulfills the requirement, as the user could indicate age on the account?

charonn0|3 days ago

Maybe the OS could ship with preconfigured age-range based usergroups. When you add a new user you could simply add them to the appropriate usergroup.

>> useradd -G under13usergroup username

singron|3 days ago

"User" in the bill actually means child, so cups etc. don't apply.

boznz|3 days ago

..or "browse as guest" on a chromebook?