top | item 47183788 (no title) chasd00 | 2 days ago > I wonder if NASA could start to adopt SpaceX like approaches? Where one doesn't try to get everything correct before acting?that would be such a culture change you'd have to disband NASA and start it over. discuss order hn newest kunai|2 days ago Yeah there is no way they do that with THREE LOCVs in their history. The fire, Challenger, and Columbia.It's a risk-averse culture for a reason. DennisP|1 day ago SpaceX is currently on a streak of over 300 successful Falcon missions in a row. I'm not convinced their approach isn't compatible with risk aversion.They push their test rockets to failure and learn from what goes wrong. That seems to be a pretty good process for getting a solid production rocket. NetMageSCW|2 days ago Tell that to the Starliner crew and the Artemis II crew.
kunai|2 days ago Yeah there is no way they do that with THREE LOCVs in their history. The fire, Challenger, and Columbia.It's a risk-averse culture for a reason. DennisP|1 day ago SpaceX is currently on a streak of over 300 successful Falcon missions in a row. I'm not convinced their approach isn't compatible with risk aversion.They push their test rockets to failure and learn from what goes wrong. That seems to be a pretty good process for getting a solid production rocket. NetMageSCW|2 days ago Tell that to the Starliner crew and the Artemis II crew.
DennisP|1 day ago SpaceX is currently on a streak of over 300 successful Falcon missions in a row. I'm not convinced their approach isn't compatible with risk aversion.They push their test rockets to failure and learn from what goes wrong. That seems to be a pretty good process for getting a solid production rocket.
kunai|2 days ago
It's a risk-averse culture for a reason.
DennisP|1 day ago
They push their test rockets to failure and learn from what goes wrong. That seems to be a pretty good process for getting a solid production rocket.
NetMageSCW|2 days ago