Same here. It's a fading memory, but the decade following 9/11 really did feature a lot of big brains turning THE COMING CALIPHATE into an existential threat to humanity. Which seems quaint, now.
I think it's a poisonous and reductive mindset to have. You can separate art from the character of the artist. If you cared about everything everyone has ever said or done in various stages of their lives, you wouldn't have much left to enjoy or appreciate.
On the other hand, there is so so much art out there, I could never hope to consume it all. It’s simple for me to use the character of the artist as a filter. I can break that rule whenever I want, but by default, other things being equal, I would prefer to consume art for pleasure from artists I respect as people.
I do consume art from outside this bubble but more to satisfy academic curiosity than pleasure.
fatbird|2 days ago
petsfed|2 days ago
That's a man who lived his craft right there.
e40|1 day ago
ses1984|2 days ago
weavejester|2 days ago
ZpJuUuNaQ5|2 days ago
I think it's a poisonous and reductive mindset to have. You can separate art from the character of the artist. If you cared about everything everyone has ever said or done in various stages of their lives, you wouldn't have much left to enjoy or appreciate.
ses1984|2 days ago
I do consume art from outside this bubble but more to satisfy academic curiosity than pleasure.
isr|2 days ago
Its not poisonous nor reductive to decide not to follow an "artist" because his "art" is repulsive.
pragmatic|2 days ago
I don’t think he was particularly kind to any proselytizing religion.
Did you read the Cantos?
BigTTYGothGF|2 days ago
RemainsOfTheDay|2 days ago
[deleted]