[mikepurvis]

It's also a very clear differentiator for them relative to Google, Facebook, and OpenAI, all of whom are clearly varying degrees of willing to sell themselves out for evil purposes.

[disiplus]

It will also cost openai dearly if they don't communicate clearly, because I for one will internally push to switch from openai (we are on azure actually) to anthropic. Besides that my private account also.

[gritspants]

You can deploy Opus and Sonnet on Azure.

[madeofpalk]

This will not cost OpenAI anything.

[RivieraKid]

Is making effective weapons evil?

[spaghetdefects]

Given the history of US military adventurism and that we’re about to start another completely unjustified war of aggression against Iran, yes. Absolutely yes.

[thesuperbigfrog]

A weapon is a tool.

Whether they are good or evil depends on the hands that hold it.

In good hands, weapons provide defense, deterrence, and protection.

In bad hands, weapons hurt the innocent, instill fear, and oppress.

The hands that wield them make all the difference.

[etrautmann]

That’s a simplistic framing (obviously)

[biophysboy]

What does effective weapons mean in this particular instance?

[mikepurvis]

Depends what the customers of anthropic and OpenAI think.

[MiguelX413]

Yeah

[underlipton]

"You need me on that wall!"

[Avamander]

Yes?