top | item 47188264 (no title) puppycodes | 2 days ago Seems like an absurd distinction to me... Reminds me of "I was just following orders"... discuss order hn newest xvector|2 days ago I mean the distinction doesn't really matterThere are many ways to construct HITL UXes. But typically they'd take the form of the first oneI think you're missing the forest for the trees. All Anthropic is saying is that HITL is required before murder, the UX is irrelevant puppycodes|2 days ago I agree the distinction doesn't matter, but im not so sure "just" having a human in the loop qualifies as an ethical stand. Just because your not pulling the trigger doesn't make you not culpible for the outcome. unknown|2 days ago [deleted]
xvector|2 days ago I mean the distinction doesn't really matterThere are many ways to construct HITL UXes. But typically they'd take the form of the first oneI think you're missing the forest for the trees. All Anthropic is saying is that HITL is required before murder, the UX is irrelevant puppycodes|2 days ago I agree the distinction doesn't matter, but im not so sure "just" having a human in the loop qualifies as an ethical stand. Just because your not pulling the trigger doesn't make you not culpible for the outcome. unknown|2 days ago [deleted]
puppycodes|2 days ago I agree the distinction doesn't matter, but im not so sure "just" having a human in the loop qualifies as an ethical stand. Just because your not pulling the trigger doesn't make you not culpible for the outcome.
xvector|2 days ago
There are many ways to construct HITL UXes. But typically they'd take the form of the first one
I think you're missing the forest for the trees. All Anthropic is saying is that HITL is required before murder, the UX is irrelevant
puppycodes|2 days ago
unknown|2 days ago
[deleted]