(no title)
kace91 | 1 day ago
Companies who subscribed will find themselves without an important tool because the president went on a rant, and might wonder if it’s safe to depend on other American companies.
kace91 | 1 day ago
Companies who subscribed will find themselves without an important tool because the president went on a rant, and might wonder if it’s safe to depend on other American companies.
9dev|1 day ago
skeledrew|1 day ago
ExoticPearTree|1 day ago
It's not only the US being special in this case.
The problem is pretty simple: there is money to be made and someone will do what the Pentagon wants. Will it be worse in capabilities than Anthropic? Probably, but as long as it can be used to wage autonomous war wherever the US military decides, it will be good enough.
Anthropic can stick to their beliefs as much as they want, but it will not change the outcome, maybe just postpone it a bit.
On an unrelated note, I think the Pentagon erred when it labeled them a supply chain vulnerability, they should have used the DPA to make them do what they need. Less drama and much cheaper compared to replacing them with a whole different company.
segmondy|1 day ago
skeptic_ai|1 day ago
refurb|1 day ago
When the US banded human embryo research did that erode trust? I didn’t hear anything about that at the time.
DaSHacka|1 day ago