[abustamam]

Yeah, the alternative is be OK with their product being used for surveillance.

Not sure why it's controversial that they said no, regardless of the reasoning. Yeah there's a lot of marketing speak and things to cover their asses. Let's call them out on that later. Right now let's applaud them for doing the right thing.

FWIW I do not think they are the "good guys" (if I had a dollar for every company that had a policy of not being evil...). But they are certainly not siding with the bad guys here.

[pcthrowaway]

> the alternative is be OK with their product being used for surveillance.

Their statement didn't indicate they object to their product being used for surveillance, just for domestic surveillance of U.S. citizens

[louisbourgault]

> Let's call them out on that later. Right now let's applaud them for doing the right thing.

Yes, yes, yes. When I first read the stuff about this yesterday, my immediate thought was "wait, these are the only two things they have a problem with?"

But they made a stand, and that still matters. We shouldn't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. At least it's not Grok.

[pklausler]

If one really wants to take a stand against this crazy administration, they shouldn’t start it by referring to Hegseth with his assumed title.