[OccamsMirror]

I have to agree with the previous user. I'm not brew installing a closed source daemon.

I'd have to imagine that moving this out to its own repo with Claude Code would be trivial so I don't understand the resistance.

This is a great idea. I look forward to seeing a proper repo for it.

[ctmnt]

I agree. It’s a neat idea and I’d be interested in seeing the details. A downloadable tarball is a lot better than nothing, but it still makes more work to evaluate a random project than I’m inclined to perform. It makes me assume the commit history is ugly in some way (being charitable and assuming the code itself isn’t). Hearing that it’s developed within a monorepo of unrelated projects and experiments isn’t inspiring either. Anyway, perhaps someone else will download the source and report back.

Edit: To be clear, I’m not saying any of those things are true, just that those are the first thoughts I have when someone says their source is open but makes it difficult to view. In this age in which it’s so trivial and commonplace to make source easily viewable.

[rovr138]

I don't see the source in their tar archive.

it's just the homebrew cask and recipe.