[jychang]

What's up with this post? It's a link to something which has existed for a long time, and there's a bunch of dead comments below. Some weird SEO campaign thing?

[tosh]

Unsloth have just released benchmarks on how their dynamic quants perform for Qwen 3.5

https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/qwen3.5/gguf-benchmarks

[jychang]

I'm aware of that, but that's not the link of the post. The post is linking to their UD 2.0 quants from a few months back.

Also, the benchmarks are because they messed up the first version of their Qwen 3.5 XL quants by quanting some tensors to mxfp4 that should have been in higher quality, and this is their bugfix. The post literally starts out with "We updated Qwen3.5-35B Unsloth Dynamic quants being SOTA on nearly all bits" without explaining WHY they needed to update from the original version.

[az226]

I’m curious how NVFP4 compares to their Q4.

[lostmsu]

Looking at their benchmarks there doesn't appear to be meaningful difference between their quants and bartowsky quants.

[danielhanchen]

Didn't expect this as well haha on HN again - probably related to Qwen3.5