[input_sh]

It means there are no known areas that are still littered with landmines, but yes, that's not a guarantee there aren't any.

Not Croatian but Bosnian, 2030 is our target for this milestone and we have to keep de-mining ~70 square kilometres every year to be able to hit that milestone.

[stephenhuey]

I visited a friend in Sarajevo in 2014. Lovely small walkable city in a little valley, enjoyed the food and did some of the tours of old war sites inside the city and on the edge of the city. It boggled my mind then that the locals warned me not to go hiking through the pretty forest out of town because of land mines; it was hard to believe a country in Europe would have that problem in the 21st century!

[jfengel]

European wars now all feel like a throwback to the 19th century. Even the maximally horrific wars of the 20th century feel outdated in light of trade being so much more efficient.

Economic aggression is a whole new kind of warfare and plenty destructive, but just saying "you stand on some dirt and we will kill you over it" is a pure waste.

People keep comparing the war in Ukraine to World War II, but they seem to imagine themselves to be Napoleon. Maybe France could have gotten richer by winning, but today that kind of attack is just lose-lose.

From America, the Yugoslavian war felt like re-fighting some Medieval grudge. I'm sure it made some kind of sense to them at the time.

[Vosporos]

The war barely ended in 1995 after all, it's not surprising.

[pseudohadamard]

Germany still has areas you can't go to because of WWII landmines. Parts of the Huertgen Forest spring immediately to mind.

[dudul]

> it was hard to believe a country in Europe would have that problem in the 21st century!

Bless your naiveness buddy. There are still areas in France where people can't go due to mines from WWI.

Spend some time on Google reading about the Zone Rouge.

[twocommits]

Are you North American? Why is this unbeliveable?