(no title)
ndsipa_pomu | 3 days ago
It does seem that military action is correlated with increased coverage in the media of the Trump/Epstein files.
ndsipa_pomu | 3 days ago
It does seem that military action is correlated with increased coverage in the media of the Trump/Epstein files.
TowerTall|3 days ago
NoLinkToMe|2 days ago
Even now most experts agree the chance of success is extremely small, every time this was tried you got shit returns (think Libya, still a failed state after Ghadaffi fell, and Iraq is reasonably stable now but we're 2 decades in and +1m dead Iraqis).
So it's certainly a useful distraction for Trump. It's also certainly true Trump would want to pursue this objective (despite it being a stupid move to reach it) regardless of the Epstein files.
somenameforme|2 days ago
And he went quite quickly from being called a "critical partner in the fight against terror" to being overthrown and summarily murdered by US backed extremists, leaving Libya in a complete state of turmoil and deterioration, and even seeing the rise of organized slavery. [1] 'Regime change' in a nutshell.
[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Libya#Slavery_in_th...
hedayet|2 days ago
Ray20|3 days ago
ndsipa_pomu|3 days ago
I find it astounding that the U.S. population aren't storming Washington and demanding his removal. Other countries are removing people from positions who were involved with Epstein due to the massive corruption and yet the USA seems fine with allowing Trump to continue destroying everything he touches.