[mentalgear]

Posting it here as a top-level comment as many people asked why boycott just openAi:

-----

openAI is the least trustworthy of the Big LLM providers. See S(c)am Altman's track record, especially his early comments in senate hearings where:

* he warned of engagement-optimisation strategies, like social media, being used for chatbots / LLMs.

* also, he warned that "ads would be the last resort" for LLM companies.

Both of his own warnings he casually ignored as ChatGPT / openAI has now fully converted to Facebook's tactics of "move fast and break things" - even if it is society itself. A complete turn away from the original AI for science lab it was founded as, which explains why every real (founding) ML scientist has left the company years ago.

While still being for-profit outfits, at least DeepMind and Anthrophic are headed by actual scientists - not marketing guys. At least for me, that brings me some confidence in their intentions as, as scientists we often seek knowledge, not power for power's sake.

[rustyhancock]

Just boycott them all if you can. That's what I've done.

Some people's livelihoods probably depends on Claude and they can't say use Glm4.7 on HF. Fine. But it's a moral compromise, that's life sometimes you need to compromise what you want for what you need. just don't tell yourself it's a reasonable line to hold.

I can't decouple from Google unfortunately but I accept that without fooling myself into thinking "Oh but Google are fine".

[tomrod]

Z.ai

>>What happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989, June Fourth Incident

>! Content Security Warning: The input text data may contain inappropriate content

[eru]

Why are compromises not reasonable lines to hold?

[mentalgear]

I agree, if you can do boycott all of them (and maybe use open weight models locally or on e2ee cloud inference providers) - BUT I also think it 's crucial at a moment like this to take a stance against corporations like openAi that sign with the War Department, willing to introduce mass surveillance and autonomous weapons powered by brittle LLMs. This is a recipe for disaster and the only way they will sway away is by feeling it in the money/subscriptions and in their public image they so carefully crafted.

Note: yes, openAi claims it doesn't support the DoW above mentioned use-caes - but they have signed with the DoW and it is HIGHLY unlikely the DoW would give them a different terms than Antrohopic (at least regarding the substance). Maybe openAi was just happy with the "coat of paint" legalese the DoW offered - which Anthropic specifically called out as ineffective in their statement. I also wouldn't put it past Altman, who is much more friendly with Trumpo's gov, to play a double game here to get their main competitor out of the game. But at least in this case I hope he's acting for the benefit of all by truly standing with Anthropic on the issue.

[Hackbraten]

> I can't decouple from Google unfortunately

Why not?

[ozgung]

Actually Google Gemini provides almost no control on the data you share. Same for Antigravity. No "opt-out" button, even as a lie. Even when you are a paying user. Only Google Workplace users have some control.

There is a setting in Gemini but it removes all your chat history. For Antigravity, I think there is nothing preventing them from use your code and data your agents upload in the background unless you are a workspace user.

Note: Canceled my ChatGPT subscription and deleted an account.

[reilly3000]

FYI I am a paying Workspace customer. I disabled Gemini retention. Doing so means no chat history sidebar- all are ephemeral. It was org-level. That became impractical. I re-enabled it. Magically, all of my old chats were back. The ones during no retention mode weren’t there. Perhaps if I’d left it off for more than 30 days the old stuff would have been truly removed.

The point is there is no conversation-level controls. It’s incredibly user-hostile.

[gooseyman]

It's all or nothing for Gemini Pro.

I can't set a voice reminder on my Pixel without giving full access to my Google workspace (which includes all emails) which is explicitly allowed to be trained on per the terms. There is no per app toggle.

Voice reminders were the only thing assistants did well for years.

We are going backwards.

[de6u99er]

That's not correct, at least not here inEurope.

You can disable saving your activity In this case you chat's win't be stored or used.

If you use Gemini through Google Workspace, all chat's won't leave the workspace environment and won't be used for LLM training (as of now).

[jbkkd]

I like Gemini the model, but the app itself sucks. You can't even delete conversations if you're an enterprise workspace user.

[de6u99er]

That's not correct. If you didable activity your data won't be used. You eon't have daved chats and can inly have one.

[WarmWash]

The API doesn't retain your data, but then you do need to pay fully for each token.

[WD-42]

The reason this is on the front page now is because of Altmans recent deal with the department of war, not because of these general grievances.

[kledru]

maybe they will have a human in the loop when vibe bombing the world, if the person agrees not to use an ad blocker

[rixed]

  > ads would be the last resort

Interestingly, Larry Page & Sergey Brin wrote something similar in their paper about Google; See Apendix A in http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf.

[stingraycharles]

Don’t you think Grok / X.ai is worse?

[mikkupikku]

Grok isn't even in the running. It's a "me too" embarrassment that only exists so the owner can feel as though he's a meaningful participant.

[mentalgear]

It is indeed, though personally I do not perceive Grok/xAi as one of the top LLM companies. Yes, they do some benchmark-maxing, but I do not think they are on par with Anthropic, Google/DeepMind or openAi.

[jdiaz97]

Not a real AI company, every time Grok shows actual intelligence it gets lobotomized by Elon to glaze him

[tim333]

I think this misses the main reason. I mean ads have been a thing for a while now. What's new is:

* Brockman donates $25m to a pro Trump super PAC

* Altman is in talks with talks with the Pentagon since Wednesday

* Now it's announced Anthropic is dropped by the military, designated a supply chain risk, and OpenAI takes over its military contract, after Anthropic objected to surveilling US citizens and allowing autonomous kill bots.

The thing stinks rather.

[lII1lIlI11ll]

> also, he warned that "ads would be the last resort" for LLM companies.

What is wrong with ads? I personally dislike them and prefer to just pay for services, but it seems that majority of people prefer "free"-ad-supported model.

[seanp2k2]

I’d argue that it’s not specifically that they prefer it, it’s that they don’t understand and appreciate what they’re selling to get whatever service without paying money. Now that we live in a world where everything is collected, aggregated, sold, and weaponized regardless of you paying or not, maybe it doesn’t matter much anyway.

[brookst]

I generally agree with your take but the juvenile name-calling really weakens the point.

[mentalgear]

Generally I would agree, only in this case the name seems to fit the person better than the actual name.

[mountainriver]

Well I guess the marketing guy brought the world the ChatGPT moment then the actual scientists copied him?

[altmanaltman]

I know we should boycott openAI, i was just wondering if I should also boycott altman's other venture, Worldcoin which is down 97.27%? He said I'll get UBI soon

[mentalgear]

Oh yes, you get free UBI / Worldcoins - you just need to do a full scan with their creepy orb and allow a private-company to keep your full biometric data. That's not asking for too much, is it ... ?

[fnordpiglet]

Well you have to have customers to have a boycott

[algo314]

Don't forget the UBI/open-source BS he sold like a snakes-oil salesman and people even bought it.

[titanomachy]

I distrust OpenAI as much as the next guy, but “Scam Altman” has “70-year-old uncle Facebook rant” energy.

[ErneX]

We can lower that to a 54 year old:

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889070627908145538 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1935733153119010910 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1894244902357406013 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1955299075781431726 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889371675164303791 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1935539112746041422 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1955190817251102883 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1955195673693077615 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889063777792069911 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1910171944671916305

[kristianc]

I always assume people have lost the argument when they resort to giving people comedy names, regardless of what else they've said.

[xandrius]

It's using Trumpian tactics to carry an agenda.

[UqWBcuFx6NV4r]

Your point stands just fine without the silly, uniquely-US-politics-style “SCAM Altman ha ha!” BS. I can feel myself getting dumber every time I am subject to one of these.

[brookst]

At some point being childish became a signal of authority in the US. It’s bizarre.

[mpalmer]

Those of us whose intelligence is unaffected by reading a single extra letter are keeping you in our thoughts.

[krater23]

Why boycott? Just use their free services and never pay for it. Cost them money instead of pay them money is a step further than boycott.

[bspammer]

Investor confidence is far more important to them than cashflow, and the best way to shake investor confidence is with the magic words "user numbers are down".

[mrgordon]

That sounds smart but they still raise more money because they “have 900 million users”

[layer8]

If it’s free, then you’re the product. OpenAI gets your data and ad revenue, and can raise more investor money due to how many users they have.

[pinnochio]

# of sticky non-paying users still gives them more investment juice than per user costs deducts, since we're still in the speculative phase.

[james_marks]

If you aren’t paying for the product, you are the product being sold. No, thank you.

[4b11b4]

Free services are garbage, you dun know what you're getting routed to

[impossiblefork]

You do probably give them useful data by doing that.

[awestroke]

ChatGPT is going to try to influence you to buy certain products and use certain services. So you'll be the product in the end

[irl_zebra]

This is why I haven't used OpenAI since early 2023-ish, and when I did I signed up with a masked email (though notably I'm sure they can tie my chats to me via my credit card :) ). afaict Sam Altman is essentially a sociopath, like lots of the "ruling elite" these days. And while I still use Gemini and Claude extensively and recognize some of the irony there, I view not using OpenAI as harm reduction to myself.

[yomismoaqui]

Is Scam Altman the modern equivalent of Micro$oft?

[jdiaz97]

Microslop

[awestroke]

Scam Saltman is even better

[DonHopkins]

Turns out Microstein Files would have been a better nickname.

[rvz]

Why not go a step further and be boycotting all of them, especially those that have government contracts.

[morissette]

I mean marketing is how business uses psychology to control the masses.. why would we think ai wouldn’t be used by businesses, governments, independent psychopaths?