The fact that NK possess nuclear weapons strongly discourages external players from attacking it. It does not in any way change the tools NK has at its disposal domestically.
If you're trying to say that had NK not had nukes we would bomb it for 'humanitarian purposes' or 'on behalf of its people' then I have a couple of bridges for sale.
baxtr|1 day ago
cogman10|1 day ago
Syria is the prime example of this. A major reason for the civilian slaughter was foreign intervention trying regime change.
AbstractH24|1 day ago
Matl|1 day ago
If you're trying to say that had NK not had nukes we would bomb it for 'humanitarian purposes' or 'on behalf of its people' then I have a couple of bridges for sale.