[Supermancho]

> October 7th was the deadliest per capita terrorist attack since the Global Terrorism Database started recording in 1970

> You invoked scale. Those are the numbers. They don't say what you wanted them to say.

1200 Oct7 vs tens of thousands in annexation and retaliation.

The numbers speak for themselves. No need to cherry pick.

[dijit]

Nobody cherry-picked anything. Per capita, single-event, it's the number that answers the claim that was actually made — that October 7th was a "blip."

What you're doing now is a different argument entirely: aggregate conflict deaths over 77 years vs. one morning. That's not context, it's a category error dressed up as one.

For what it's worth, the full Palestinian death toll since 1948 is ~136,000 [1] — a Palestinian source, so spare me the bias complaint. That's across eight decades, multiple Arab-Israeli wars, three intifadas, and several state actors. October 7th still isn't a blip. It's a massacre inside a war.

Which is exactly what everyone's been saying.

[1] https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/145161

[Supermancho]

> What you're doing now is a different argument entirely:

I've not made an argument. I've provided the proper context that supports the original point.

>> Considering the scale of suffering caused by this conflict, - Jasonadrury

your response:

> That's not context, it's a category error dressed up as one.

You have shifted goalposts in every post. The context was the conflict in aggregate. Continue arguing with yourself. It's not compelling.

[whycome]

What’s an ‘event’?

[tovej]

That is pretty much the definition of cherry picking right there.

You sure have a big stake in defending a genocide, Jan.

[bluecalm]

Rockets regularly target Israel. If that happened to USA the war would start with the first one no matter if it was intercepted or not. Same with any other self-respecting country. Israel is fully justified trying to eliminate threats to itself. It's not only about October 7th.