[Supermancho]

> What you're doing now is a different argument entirely:

I've not made an argument. I've provided the proper context that supports the original point.

>> Considering the scale of suffering caused by this conflict, - Jasonadrury

your response:

> That's not context, it's a category error dressed up as one.

You have shifted goalposts in every post. The context was the conflict in aggregate. Continue arguing with yourself. It's not compelling.

[dijit]

"I've not made an argument" is a fascinating claim immediately after quoting someone who used aggregate scale to call October 7th a "blip"- and agreeing with them.

Providing context in support of a conclusion is making an argument. That's what arguments are.

The goalposts that moved: "blip" (single event framing) -> "scale of the conflict" (aggregate framing) -> "I wasn't arguing anything." Three posts, three different claims, now apparently none of them count.

Noted.