[edmundsauto]

I’m not sure, but I think you’re right. I was thinking about the logical implications of the. If they are a supply chain risk without a contract, how does the existence of a contract suddenly make them not a risk? Especially if the DoD strong arms them into a deal.

Because the act that the SCR designation would “protect” against is treason, so I don’t think people would care too much whether there’s a contract.