(no title)
lxgr | 1 day ago
Some still might, e.g. for corporate or high security contexts, but I don't think it'll become a mass-adopted thing if things don't somehow drastically change course.
lxgr | 1 day ago
Some still might, e.g. for corporate or high security contexts, but I don't think it'll become a mass-adopted thing if things don't somehow drastically change course.
valenterry|1 day ago
lxgr|21 hours ago
Yes, because hardware authenticators (like Yubikeys) still commonly support it, and it makes sense there.
I guess they could add an explicit remark like "synchronized credentials must not support attestation", and given the amount of FUD this regularly seems to generate I'd appreciate that. But attestation semantics seem to be governed more by FIDO than the W3C, so putting that in the WebAuthN spec would be a bit awkward, I think.