[esafak]

Does your technique break the cache? edit: Thanks.

[doctorpangloss]

The LLM that the "author" is using has no idea what it's talking about, and the reply you got is nonsense.

@dang it's really bad lately.

[mksglu]

Nope. The raw data never enters the conversation history in the first place, so there's nothing to invalidate. Tool output runs in a sandbox, a short summary comes back, and the full data sits in a local FTS5 index. The conversation cache stays intact because the context itself doesn't change after the fact.