(no title)
Macha | 1 day ago
- Code written by the Minio team, which they have full ownership of and can relicense as they wish
- Code written by third party contributors, where Minio required the contributors to provide Minio a BSD license to use the contributions but only published it to other people under AGPL.
So the AGPL doesn't bind Minio themselves because of their licensing policy. (Which is why while pure AGPL might be the open source maximalist license, AGPL + CLA is almost at the opposite end of the scale)
rzerowan|1 day ago
Whats the situation for a AGPL fork , were one to use it can the company assert rights like they did to Nutanix.
Macha|1 day ago
patmorgan23|1 day ago
Could you not have a CLA that only allows the project to use a specific license?
Macha|1 day ago
If Minio just wanted to use the changes under AGPL, the contributor could just license them under AGPL, no CLA needed.
throawayonthe|1 day ago
Macha|1 day ago
phoronixrly|1 day ago
bigfatkitten|1 day ago
If I get my patches upstream, then I don’t have to waste time reintegrating patches and rebuilding packages when I could instead be doing productive things.
unknown|1 day ago
[deleted]