top | item 47201199 (no title) rnewme | 1 day ago This really doesnt read like llm to me. What part triggered you? discuss order hn newest fireflies_|1 day ago This is where I started getting that feeling:> The curse of dimensionality is not theoretical — it’s painfully practical. In high dimensions, naive distance metrics degrade quickly.>> Scaling and normalization are not optional details. They fundamentally shape the geometry of the space. rendaw|1 day ago > GBMs are not “just models.” They’re systems.Rule of 3 lists, bullet points (with the bullet points removed from the formatting for some reason).
fireflies_|1 day ago This is where I started getting that feeling:> The curse of dimensionality is not theoretical — it’s painfully practical. In high dimensions, naive distance metrics degrade quickly.>> Scaling and normalization are not optional details. They fundamentally shape the geometry of the space. rendaw|1 day ago > GBMs are not “just models.” They’re systems.Rule of 3 lists, bullet points (with the bullet points removed from the formatting for some reason).
rendaw|1 day ago > GBMs are not “just models.” They’re systems.Rule of 3 lists, bullet points (with the bullet points removed from the formatting for some reason).
fireflies_|1 day ago
> The curse of dimensionality is not theoretical — it’s painfully practical. In high dimensions, naive distance metrics degrade quickly.
>
> Scaling and normalization are not optional details. They fundamentally shape the geometry of the space.
rendaw|1 day ago
Rule of 3 lists, bullet points (with the bullet points removed from the formatting for some reason).