top | item 47201230

(no title)

_alternator_ | 1 day ago

This is exactly what it says: the only restrictions are the restrictions that are already in law. This seems like the weasel language Dario was talking about.

discuss

order

kivle|1 day ago

Laws that can be changed on a whim by "executive orders", or laws that apparently can be ignored completely, like international law.

godelski|1 day ago

Like by an administration who is constantly ignoring and violating both domestic and international law?

Like by an administration that likes to act extra judiciously and ignore habeas corups?

I wonder where we'd find such a government. Probably shouldn't give them the power to "do anything legal NOR 'consistent with operational requirements'". That's the power to do anything they want

wrsh07|1 day ago

They do note that their contract language specifically references the laws as they exist today.

Presumably if the laws become less restrictive, that does not impact OpenAI's contract with them (nothing would change) but if the laws become more restrictive (eg certain loopholes in processing American's data get closed) then OpenAI and the DoD should presumably^ not break the new laws.

^ we all get to decide how much work this presumably is doing

shikon7|1 day ago

No, executive orders can't change law and international law, unless ratified by congress, is not democratically legitimized and applicable law in the US to begin with

wrsh07|1 day ago

Not that this means the big AI corps should relax their values (it truly doesn't), but I would be extremely surprised if the DoD/DoW doesn't have anyone capable of fine tuning an open weights model for this purpose.

And, I mean, if they don't, gpt 5.3 is going to be pretty good help

Given the volume fine tuning a small model is probably the only cost effective way to do it anyway

ajyoon|1 day ago

Contrary to benchmarks, open weight models are way behind the frontier.