top | item 47201269 (no title) Macha | 1 day ago That would seem a bizarre position from the FSF, since it would make the license on combined GPL works unenforceable. Do you have a source for that? discuss order hn newest throawayonthe|1 day ago main point is expressed here i think: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.htmlbut also seems i was mistaken about the status of linux copyright, they actually do have distributed copyright, apologies nine_k|1 day ago GPL maternally depends on copyright enforcement. Who would sue if an infringement is detected? All the contributors collectively? Macha|1 day ago As with a lot of the past Linux based enforcements of the GPL, any of the contributors
throawayonthe|1 day ago main point is expressed here i think: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.htmlbut also seems i was mistaken about the status of linux copyright, they actually do have distributed copyright, apologies
nine_k|1 day ago GPL maternally depends on copyright enforcement. Who would sue if an infringement is detected? All the contributors collectively? Macha|1 day ago As with a lot of the past Linux based enforcements of the GPL, any of the contributors
Macha|1 day ago As with a lot of the past Linux based enforcements of the GPL, any of the contributors
throawayonthe|1 day ago
but also seems i was mistaken about the status of linux copyright, they actually do have distributed copyright, apologies
nine_k|1 day ago
Macha|1 day ago