top | item 47202593 (no title) Havoc | 22 hours ago Very much feels like OpenAI trying to PR manage their weaker ethical stance discuss order hn newest isodev|22 hours ago Both their stances are flawed because their ethics apparently end at the border - none of them have a problem being unethical internationally (all the red lines talk is about what they don’t want to do in the us) mlyle|22 hours ago ? we're talking about autonomous weapons systems. That would be internationally.Secondarily, we're talking about domestic surveillance / law enforcement. That would be domestic.(But they do not find an issue with international intelligence gathering-- which is a legitimate purpose of national security apparatus). load replies (4) allajfjwbwkwja|21 hours ago There's an obvious difference.Surveillance within the border is oppressive 1984-style surveillance state behavior.International spying is a universal tradition. unknown|21 hours ago [deleted]
isodev|22 hours ago Both their stances are flawed because their ethics apparently end at the border - none of them have a problem being unethical internationally (all the red lines talk is about what they don’t want to do in the us) mlyle|22 hours ago ? we're talking about autonomous weapons systems. That would be internationally.Secondarily, we're talking about domestic surveillance / law enforcement. That would be domestic.(But they do not find an issue with international intelligence gathering-- which is a legitimate purpose of national security apparatus). load replies (4) allajfjwbwkwja|21 hours ago There's an obvious difference.Surveillance within the border is oppressive 1984-style surveillance state behavior.International spying is a universal tradition.
mlyle|22 hours ago ? we're talking about autonomous weapons systems. That would be internationally.Secondarily, we're talking about domestic surveillance / law enforcement. That would be domestic.(But they do not find an issue with international intelligence gathering-- which is a legitimate purpose of national security apparatus). load replies (4)
allajfjwbwkwja|21 hours ago There's an obvious difference.Surveillance within the border is oppressive 1984-style surveillance state behavior.International spying is a universal tradition.
isodev|22 hours ago
mlyle|22 hours ago
Secondarily, we're talking about domestic surveillance / law enforcement. That would be domestic.
(But they do not find an issue with international intelligence gathering-- which is a legitimate purpose of national security apparatus).
allajfjwbwkwja|21 hours ago
Surveillance within the border is oppressive 1984-style surveillance state behavior.
International spying is a universal tradition.
unknown|21 hours ago
[deleted]