[ibeckermayer]

Cool that it's possible but basically unusable performance characteristics. For an 8192 token prompt they report a ~1.5 minute time-to-first-token and then 8.30tk/s from there. For context ChatGPT is typically <<1s ttft and ~50tk/s.

[fc417fc802]

Given that APU only has 4 channels isn't this setup comically starved for bandwidth? By the same token, wouldn't you expect performance to scale approximately linearly as you add additional boxes? And wouldn't you be better off with smaller nodes (ie less RAM and CPU power per box)?

If I'm right about that then if you're willing to go in for somewhere in the vicinity of $30k (24x the Max 385 model) you should be able to achieve ChatGPT performance.

[ibeckermayer]

Good thought... I think you're wrong because the dominant factor is bandwidth over the interconnect. In this case they're using 5Gbps over Ethernet; compare that to 80-120 Gbps for a Thunderbolt 5 connected Mac Studio cluster: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFgTxr5yst0

[JKCalhoun]

I've never understood the obsession with token/s. I'm fine with asking a question and then going on to another task (which might be making coffee).

Even with a cloud-based LLM where the response is pretty snappy, I still find that I wander off and return when I am ready to digest the entire response.

[ibeckermayer]

Your workflow is unusual, oftentimes there is a vigorous back and forth, or a desired output like code generation, etc where a low tk/s drastically effects ux and user productivity.

But the real kicker here is the 90s ttft, that means you ask a question and don't see anything for a full minute and a half.

[nitinreddy88]

You are fine with it. But may be rest of the world is not. Anyway, to compare performance/benchmark, we need metrics and this is one of the basic metric to measure.