[nojito]

>THe AI won't get the perfect system in one shot, far from it! And especially not from sloppy initial requirements that leave a lot of edge (or not-so-edge) cases unadressed. But if you have a good requirement to start with, you have a chance to correct the AI, keep it on track; you have something to go back to and ask other AI, "is this implementation conforming to the spec or did it miss things?"

This is an antiquated way of thinking. If you ramp up the number of agents you're using the auto-correcting and reviewing behavior kicks in which makes for much less human intervention until the final code review.

[galaxyLogic]

Yes, but what about the "spec-review"? Isn't that even more important? Is the system doing what we (and its users) need it to be doing?