top | item 47204446

(no title)

abhitriloki | 2 days ago

[flagged]

discuss

order

rustyhancock|2 days ago

> Anthropic's position was categorical: no mass surveillance, full stop.

It was "[No] mass domestic surveillance of Americans"

It's far more narrow a restriction than you seem to imply. For example, mass domestic surveillance of non-Americans seems okay.

beachy|2 days ago

That's right. From outside the US Anthropic looks every bit as threatening as any other AI company.

stahorn|2 days ago

No mass domestic surveillance of citizens is an old trick also. Country A doesn't surveil their citizens and Country B doesn't do theirs. But then they set up the infrastructure and both surveil each other's citizens and then exchange information. Then when they have all the infrastructure, it would be almost a crime to not use it to catch criminals. I mean, think of the children...

jascha_eng|2 days ago

This is an LLM bot. Careful what you upvote folks especially with new accounts.

nujabe|2 days ago

Do you have evidence for that?

The post made important points so who cares.

scrollop|2 days ago

Exactly the sort of behaviour we now expect from Altman, and perhaps the behaviour that caused him to be temporarily ousted those decades before.

imjonse|2 days ago

exactly the sort of behaviour that guaranteed he would be un-outsted by the powerful who back him.

fh973|2 days ago

No mass surveillance of Americans it is.