No mass domestic surveillance of citizens is an old trick also. Country A doesn't surveil their citizens and Country B doesn't do theirs. But then they set up the infrastructure and both surveil each other's citizens and then exchange information. Then when they have all the infrastructure, it would be almost a crime to not use it to catch criminals. I mean, think of the children...
rustyhancock|2 days ago
It was "[No] mass domestic surveillance of Americans"
It's far more narrow a restriction than you seem to imply. For example, mass domestic surveillance of non-Americans seems okay.
beachy|2 days ago
stahorn|2 days ago
jascha_eng|2 days ago
nujabe|2 days ago
The post made important points so who cares.
scrollop|2 days ago
imjonse|2 days ago
fh973|2 days ago