top | item 47204744

(no title)

brikym | 15 hours ago

Hey Anthropic, how about you use AGENTS.md for one thing.

discuss

order

Sammi|13 hours ago

Before this week I was sure Anthropic were actually just as soulless as OpenAi, just because they don't support open standards like AGENTS.md and /.agents/skills. They can so easily win the support of the open source crowd if they just support open standards like these.

The /.agents/skills issue for claude code is here: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/16345

Their automatic close bot will close it soon as it's been three weeks since the last comment.

cma|4 hours ago

Why not just symlink

tomComb|6 hours ago

I felt that way too, until I noticed how different their schemes are for discovering these files, e.g. Claude will pick up context files in parent folders, and Codex doesn’t.

Maybe it’s better that they maintain different names to prevent people from assuming that they work the same

2001zhaozhao|15 hours ago

Just make a symlink of CLAUDE.md -> AGENTS.md

I have seen quite a few open source projects do this. It works quite well.

Another alternative is to create CLAUDE.md with the exact contents: "@AGENTS.md"

brikym|13 hours ago

We all know it's easy... so why don't Anthropic do it. Seems rather petty insisting their users put advertising in their repo or someone else's repo.

deaux|14 hours ago

Big projects should have a lot of nested AGENTS.md files, it's inconvenient and they simply need to add support for the universal standard as everyone else has done rather than being a weird holdout like IE6.

deaux|15 hours ago

Now that would make it easier for Codex users to switch indeed! This seems like the best timing for it they're ever gonna get, and worth the ultra tiny loss of marketing value their "CLAUDE.md" naming provides.

For the Anthropic employees here reading along, pitch it to whoever has kept blocking this, because you need to get the most out of this opportunity here.

Handy-Man|9 hours ago

Why would they? They were first with CLAUDE.md. Others could have adopted to that if they wanted. Don’t see a reason for Claude to change their approach.

kelnos|4 hours ago

Being a good citizen of the commons means not hard-coding things specific about your product as a standard. ChatGPT or Gemini using a file called "CLAUDE" doesn't make sense. The first mover doesn't just automatically win.