(no title)
jascha_eng | 15 hours ago
I think there is significant value in making people second guess content and look at it critically. Especially in a time where it is so easy to fake expertise. We all need to train that skill anyway these days for all online interactions.
10 years ago it was clickbait titles that we needed to learn to ignore, today it is LLM generated content. We will get there, but by not calling it out publicly we are making it easier for adversaries to fool everyone.
And yes I don't want to falsely accuse anyone of LLM slop either but they can defend themselves and making mistakes is part of the learning process for all of us. Writers and commenters will learn how to not sound like an LLM and we will more finely atune to the nuance between polished human writing and AI.
tomhow|6 hours ago
The answer is not to suddenly abandon one of HN’s most important principles, which is that we want to keep discussion on-topic and discourage off-topic meta discussion.
We’re developing software to respond to the new challenges that are emerging, and we already have plenty of people who email us to when they notice generated content, which is great.
We know there is no perfect approach; there never is in a large community of humans. But principles matter, and we need to trust that the principles that have made HN what it is over nearly two decades will keep it strong for years to come.
By the way, your own original comment called on us to “Please do something more rigorous than manually deleting accounts”; we are doing that but these things take time to develop, test and perfect on a platform like ours.