[toraway]

The constitution assigns legislative power to the Congress, and does not allow the President to rewrite law by fiat.

The Department of Defense was established by the National Security Act of 1947 and is still the law of the land until they pass legislation amending it.

The Trump Administration could request the Republican controlled Congress rename the DoD in the NDA, but for whatever reason they have not done so.

So it's correct to say that accepting the idea that a President can rewrite a law based on their own personal whims without Congress is in opposition to fundamental constitutional separation of powers.

[try_the_bass]

Still seems like a really weird hill to die on. It's just branding, as far as I can tell?

And the President of this country has frequently rewritten laws based on their own personal whims, for a very long time now. Trump's actions in this vein might be the most blatant in this regard, but Executive power has been allowed to grow relatively unchecked for a number of decades already, largely because Congress has been unwilling or unable to do anything about it.

Which is why I think opposing this particular abuse of Executive power (if it really is such a thing) is a really weird hill to die on.