[oytis]

> you are not imagining things. The job changed. The expectations changed. And nobody sent a memo.

Looks like something AI would say. Regardless of how it really was written

[butILoveLife]

Its really long winded. The entire thing could have been a couple bullet points.

Admittedly it was so long and basic, I stopped halfway.

[alex_suzuki]

> The entire thing could have been a couple bullet points

It probably was

[383toast]

Yep the article is 100% AI generated according to Pangram

[rhubarbtree]

Why is AI such a bad writer? Phrasing like this feels like reading Fox News.

[gf263]

I saw someone point out something like: ai makes every sentence count. There’s no building or allowing a point to breathe. Every sentence is an axiom to get the meaning across, and its so grating

[lelanthran]

> Why is AI such a bad writer?

A better question is "Why can't the devs producing code with AI spot the same poor patterns in the code they are generating?"

Maybe my point is that, to a poor speaker of English, the AI blogpost looks good and reads well. In much the same way, to a poor programmer, the AI produced code looks good and reads well.

In a nutshell, if it generates poor English, WTF would anyone think it generates anything but poor code?

[oytis]

To be honest it still feels crazy that AI is a writer at all. But yeah, not a good one

[rcvassallo83]

Article definitely has an AI writing style