top | item 47207944 (no title) phyzome | 15 hours ago Reminder that AI-writing detection tools are largely junk. discuss order hn newest jatins|7 hours ago Pangram is reliable. Quoting from their website> Pangram achieves essentially zero false positive rates and false negative rates on medium-length to long passages. 383toast|13 hours ago Note Pangram is not like the others and has heavy academic research on statistical method soundness lelanthran|11 hours ago > Reminder that AI-writing detection tools are largely junk.In what way? False positives or false negatives?
jatins|7 hours ago Pangram is reliable. Quoting from their website> Pangram achieves essentially zero false positive rates and false negative rates on medium-length to long passages.
383toast|13 hours ago Note Pangram is not like the others and has heavy academic research on statistical method soundness
lelanthran|11 hours ago > Reminder that AI-writing detection tools are largely junk.In what way? False positives or false negatives?
jatins|7 hours ago
> Pangram achieves essentially zero false positive rates and false negative rates on medium-length to long passages.
383toast|13 hours ago
lelanthran|11 hours ago
In what way? False positives or false negatives?