top | item 47208603

(no title)

g-b-r | 16 hours ago

This is meant to insult AI skeptics, let's not pretend to be idiots.

It should be flagged and taken down.

discuss

order

ylee|12 hours ago

> This is meant to insult AI skeptics, let's not pretend to be idiots.

Only an idiot would read the piece in that way.

>It should be flagged and taken down.

Even if it really did "insult AI skeptics" (and, again, no one with any reasonable ability to comprehend wit and satire would take it that way), how is that justification to get it "flagged and taken down"?!?

g-b-r|8 hours ago

Well, one of us is probably that indeed.

> how is that justification to get it "flagged and taken down"?!?

Posts that are likely to result in flames generally are.

rmsaksida|16 hours ago

That is not what this is meant as.

g-b-r|8 hours ago

Do explain what you meant it to be.

unconed|15 hours ago

>Despite the quick spread of agentic coding, institutional inertia, affordability, and limitations in human neuroplasticity were barriers to universal adoption of the new technology.

Blaming lack of adoption purely on regressive factors follows the same frame that AI firms set. It isn't very effective satire for that reason.

It couldn't be that there is something essential and elementary that is wrong with the output, no... all these experienced experts are just troglodites and wrong and we should instead tag along with the people who offloaded the parts of their work they found tough to a machine the first chance they got.

There's no such thing as ape coding. There's still just coding, and vibe coding.