[apt-apt-apt-apt]

Why is this sentiment expressed so often ("It was written/edited by AI"?

It seems to bother people, perhaps since it may have been low-effort. Doesn't it not matter as long as the content is good? Otherwise, it seems to be no different than a standard low-quality post.

[layer8]

The formulaic style/cadence/structure/tone is annoying, for one due to its LLM-induced prevalence, but also because it is padded and stretched without adding substance while being dyed in superficialities, and has a weird tendency of meandering through its thematic territory, like the author was slightly distracted or is writing the same thing for the 20th time, or is missing a good editor. Pre-LLM, it might have been an okay-ish, but not great, article. Now it’s just grating and makes you feel like you’re wasting your time reading it.

[lelanthran]

> Doesn't it not matter as long as the content is good?

"Why is everyone railing against my spam? Doesn't it not matter as long as the deal I am offering is good?"

When people don't want the spam, it is irrelevant whether the spammer is offering a good deal or not.

[bonoboTP]

When I want to read Ai writing (which is not never), I chat with it myself and I prompt it better and get more interesting stuff than these generic insight blogspam.

[rsynnott]

LLM prose is typically _painful_ to read, overly long, and bullshit-heavy.