(no title)
kid64 | 1 day ago
The article even references English's built-in delimiter, the quotation mark, which is reprented as a token for Claude, part of its training data.
So are we sure the lesson isn't simply to leverage delimiters, such as quotation marks, in prompts, period? The article doesn't identify any way in which XML is superior to quotation marks in scenarios requiring the type of disambiguation quotation marks provide.
Rather, the example XML tags shown seem to be serving as a shorthand for notating sections of the prompt ("treat this part of the prompt in this particular way"). That's useful, but seems to be addressing concerns that are separate from those contemplated by the author.
sheept|1 day ago
bear3r|1 day ago
xeyownt|1 day ago
RandomBK|1 day ago
mpyne|1 day ago
Even simple --- separators is usually enough to get good results, it just needs to be reasonably clear which items are distinct from each other.
jinushaun|1 day ago
wolttam|1 day ago