(no title)
pgaddict | 3 hours ago
I wouldn't be all that surprised if this was (partially) due to Postgres being less optimized back then, which might have hidden some of the random vs. sequential differences. But that's just a wild guess.
pgaddict | 3 hours ago
I wouldn't be all that surprised if this was (partially) due to Postgres being less optimized back then, which might have hidden some of the random vs. sequential differences. But that's just a wild guess.
No comments yet.