top | item 47211454

(no title)

prhn | 12 hours ago

At the risk of sounding ignorant, why didn't the various police cruisers and even the ambulance itself just push the damn thing out of the way? That's what the push bars attached to the front of their vehicles are for.

discuss

order

xoxxala|11 hours ago

When my mom was a firefighter, and a car was blocking a hydrant, she happily broke windows and pushed the hose right through the car. Didn't happen a lot, but did happen more than once.

vineyardmike|11 hours ago

A human police over eventually got into the drivers seat to move the car. They sat around for minutes before doing so. They could’ve gotten into it immediately.

But yea they absolutely could’ve also just slammed it and moved on too.

AngryData|10 hours ago

The cops only do that if they can be sure they will be able to charge someone else for the damages. For their vehicle, for their "injuries", and also adding in to their department bonuses, but they get none of that if they can't charge somebody with a crime easily. Ambulances aren't really made to do that and are crazy expensive, plus the drivers would likely be taking on a bunch of the liability from the crash, although the ambulance itself likely would survive just fine because they are tough. The fire department are the only ones that have the trifecta of vehicles made to push other vehicles out of the way, are not paid by the extent that they can extort people for money, and are not going to be held liable for damages.

snickerbockers|11 hours ago

Because its not a trailer for Grand Theft Auto 6.

dangus|11 hours ago

Ambulances aren’t exactly designed to act as battering rams.

They ram a car and the radiator goes bust and now you’ve got an ambulance with no engine.

Or you just hurt the passengers inside the Waymo and now you’ve got two emergencies.

AdrianB1|11 hours ago

Ambulances can be seriously damaged by attempting to do it. Police cruisers can do it, but then they may be sued for damages. I know that cars blocking fire hydrants were a serious problem in the past and owners sued firemen for pulling water hoses through their cars after breaking the windows - the law was not allowing it even if the line through the car was the only option.

ibejoeb|11 hours ago

Sounds like trolling, but the idea of Waymo suing a responder to a terrorist attack is too ridiculous.

zephen|11 hours ago

> owners sued firemen for pulling water hoses through their cars after breaking the windows - the law was not allowing it even if the line through the car was the only option.

I'll bet anything you have no citation for this.

Sovereign immunity and necessity combine to make sure that firefighters and cops can do whatever the fuck is required.

The aftermath is even more brutal. You will receive multiple tickets for this, you will receive a bill for damages to the hose they had to thread through your windows (or to the police car that rammed you out of the way), and your car insurance will point to a clause in their policy that says that you are personally on the hook for all of this.

You may even face civil or even criminal liability for any damages to whatever is on fire, or loss of life, that a good prosecutor or plaintiff's lawyer can convince a jury is directly traceable to your egregious conduct in parking your precious car in front of the damn fire hydrant.

johnnyApplePRNG|11 hours ago

My thoughts exactly.

What an embarrassment.

"Authorities" paralyzed by politeness when lives are in the balance.