top | item 47211582

(no title)

KennyBlanken | 7 hours ago

I've never understood why everyone acts like this is some bizarre legal quagmire.

If I make a robot and it goes and kills someone, nobody sits around navel gazing wondering how they're going to prosecute a robot.

If I make a device that pulls the trigger of a gun aimed at someone tied to a chair when I click a button on my cell phone, or something green appears in the camera attached to the device, or time reaches 11:24:42pm - nobody sits around navel gazing wondering how they're going to prosecute an electronic device.

In both cases, I would be prosecuted.

These cars are robots. They are designed, constructed, programmed, and monitored/supervised by humans. The humans are responsible for anything the robots do that cause damage, violate civil regulations, or criminal laws.

The solution here is very simple. Seize all the corporate email records, code, etc. and charge everyone involved in the production of the code that caused the "behavior", along with anyone whose negligence in supervision or review failed to catch the defect, or anyone who knew the car would or could do what it did, and failed to blow the whistle or failed to stop the car hitting the road.

Maybe then SV will stop "beta testing" fatal devices on the general public.

discuss

order

himata4113|7 hours ago

I can feel like a lot of people will disagree with you, but this is a pretty fair comparison. The people will disagree the most is the waymo users and I see their POV as well since as they have said: "much better than uber and always on time".

zephen|6 hours ago

A few years ago I would have believed this.

But then, I would have also believed that youtube would have been sued into oblivion before it even got established, and that uber and lyft would not have been able to sidestep all the municipal regulations, and that we would have photographic evidence of bigfoot by now.

sashank_1509|6 hours ago

This is ridiculous. We don’t send surgeons to jail if they mistakenly kill their patient.

AngryData|5 hours ago

We can and do if they are shown to be negligent or irresponsible, and at the very least are responsible for damages, hence medical malpractice insurance to ensure people get paid even if the surgeon is bankrupt.