[nobulexdev]

Based off of all the feedback here, I have built a quick demo that shows the multi-party use case on why cryptography matters when a third party needs to verify compliance independently:

https://github.com/nobulexdev/nobulex/blob/main/demo/two-par...

Run it: npx tsx demo/two-party-verify.ts

Three steps: operator creates a covenant, claims compliance and then a regulator verifies the cryptographic proof without trusting the operator. That is the core of what Nobulex does. Everything else is tooling around this pattern. Appreciate the pushback, as it helped clarify what actually matters.

[mlyle]

> I have built a quick demo

This is obvs 5 minutes of LLM generated code

> a regulator verifies the cryptographic proof without trusting the operator.

No, the regulator verifies that the operator signed the proof, which isn't a lot different from the operator saying it alone.