[latexr]

A better solution would be to read and understand the code before committing it.

[mandel_x]

People won’t do that, unfortunately. We are a dying breed (I hate it). I went against my own instincts and vibe code this, works as a proof of concept.

You can see the session (including my typos) and compare what was asked for and what you got.

[kace91]

Your starting point is that people won’t read code, and you expect them to read someone’s llm session from git?

[midnitewarrior]

Sounds like we've got an Ape Coder here!

https://rsaksida.com/blog/ape-coding/

[add-sub-mul-div]

Personally, I'm not going to be complicit in reshaping the field around the lazy and undisciplined.

[hrmtst93837]

Reading and understanding the code is essential, but in a collaborative environment, reviewing AI-generated code can be complex. It's about balancing trust in AI with the need for human oversight.