top | item 47214159

(no title)

closeparen | 7 hours ago

We have a lot of tools (starting with the internal wiki) which are normally only exposed to engineers through web interfaces; MCPs make them available to terminal agents to use autonomously. This can get really interesting with e.g. giving Claude access to query logs and metrics to debug a production issue.

It is obnoxious that MCP results always go directly into the context window. I'd prefer to dump a large payload into Claude's filesystem and let him figure it out from there. But some of the places MCPs can be used don't even have filesystems.

discuss

order

seemaze|7 hours ago

> dump a large payload into Claude's filesystem and let him figure it out

I just realized I never thought of Claude as ‘him’, usually I think of Claude as ‘it’..

D-Machine|5 hours ago

Because "him" is objectively wrong, under almost any interpretation of any words involved. You can cause Claude, or any text-based LLM, to emit language that matches almost any personality / gender / character in the training set. At best you might be able to say "the default outputs have a masculine tone / vibe", but this still doesn't justify, by modern discourse, the "him".

kitd|6 hours ago

Be careful. I'm pretty sure my wife is going to leave me for Claude any day now.