If you have the data, it would be cool to see this colorized by genre and length. My guess is that dramas have a higher quality to rewatchability ratio than comedies, and that a similar relationship exists between long movies and short ones.
I just have to say that I think your execution is exceptional. Everything is so clearly laid out, your design is great. Even though I didn't understand the x/y axis of how you were rating the movies, it didn't matter, up and to the right just meant 'better', which was simple enough for me.
If you don't mind my asking, how long have you been working on this?
Top notch design and execution! Just love the discovery line/zoom feature, very unique and useful.
Minor issues:
- How are the hearts calculated?
- The graph is too crowded, I would put genres on the left of the graph and allow genre filtering
- I expected selecting a genre will show me the graph with just that genre, it didn't happen, the graph wasn't shown.
- Bug? clicking on one of the films, eg: http://goodfil.ms/film/108266-arthur shows a mini graph, but nothing is highlighted on it, not even the file itself. Nothing happened clicking on any of the circles (using Chrome)
- I want search to be able to indicate the film on the graph
- related films should also include really related films instead of ones by the "line" metric. Eg, Arthur 2011 should show older Arthur film.
[+] [-] paulgb|13 years ago|reply
Very cool visualization!
[+] [-] brianfryer|13 years ago|reply
What a FANTASTIC idea! I'd like to discover other movies of similar genre
> ... and length
TV shows vs. feature-length films?
[+] [-] caffeineninja|13 years ago|reply
Couple things:
1) Clicking on tabs in the graph causes you to snap to the top of the page. Adding return false; to your tab/link handler will fix that.
2) There's no explanation anywhere for the lines - what do they refer to?
3) Would be nice to be able to zoom in and pan rather than click.
[+] [-] geelen|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tlrobinson|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johnb|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] brianfryer|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pedalpete|13 years ago|reply
If you don't mind my asking, how long have you been working on this?
[+] [-] johnb|13 years ago|reply
The graph specifically? Was a Glen (founding dev) & Charlie (designer) working for a few days straight.
[+] [-] fuzzythinker|13 years ago|reply
Minor issues:
- How are the hearts calculated?
- The graph is too crowded, I would put genres on the left of the graph and allow genre filtering
- I expected selecting a genre will show me the graph with just that genre, it didn't happen, the graph wasn't shown.
- Bug? clicking on one of the films, eg: http://goodfil.ms/film/108266-arthur shows a mini graph, but nothing is highlighted on it, not even the file itself. Nothing happened clicking on any of the circles (using Chrome)
- I want search to be able to indicate the film on the graph
- related films should also include really related films instead of ones by the "line" metric. Eg, Arthur 2011 should show older Arthur film.
[+] [-] minikomi|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rurounijones|13 years ago|reply
On a side-note. In the above query one of the front-runners seems to be "Grave of the fireflies" which does not surprise me what-so-ever.
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] geelen|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pointlessjon|13 years ago|reply