(edit: I see you answered a sibling comment with the same question. TL;DR: Potential output is the output pretending that curtailment did not apply. Thanks!)
A UI or terminology question: when 'Potential output' says it is 'Including curtailment', does this mean that it pretends that curtailment doesn't apply, or that it subtracts the curtailed power from the total available so that the total power shown is only the power actually transmitted (exported) to the grid? It's very likely that I'm just not familiar enough with the terms, but this wasn't immediately clear. My guess is the former meaning, although I can imagine it meaning either.
Regardless, this is incredibly neat, and I'd love to see this kind of data for the grid that serves me (Eastern Interconnect in the US) -- are you aware of any sites similar?
Love your stuff Robin. The graphs and wind turbine model are particular favourites
How can we fix the curtailment problem? Storage nearer the turbines or just more transmission capacity generally? I presume we'd saturate storage pretty quickly so is it just a case of running more grid wiring from Scotland to say.. Manchester?
Thanks! The ultimate fix is to finish upgrading the aging grid. There are other things that can improve the situation however, such as building wind farms away from these constraints, storage (but these can sometimes exacerbate constraints), demand flexibility (eg. place demand above constraints), zonal/regional pricing, and probably more I can't remember off the top of my head.
Great website! It would be even more great if it compared total wind generation with total UK power usage for the same time period (with a % for wind power usage).
Not to steal from Robin's excellent work, you can see how much it's been (low carbon/renewables generation) over the last twelve months at https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/GB/12mo/monthly (~56% renewables, ~73% low carbon)
(Robin, if there is a way to see this on your site, I could not find it, my apologies!)
In Ireland, we’re running at about 75% renewables for the day, with most of that being wind. The absolute numbers are smaller, but that’s a peak of about 500 MW of solar and 3.6GW of wind, against something like 5-6Gw of demand.
[+] [-] robhawkes|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] countrymile|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] mcrmonkey|6 days ago|reply
What are the lines that cross Scotland ? At time of writing they are red where as other lines further south are green.
I know of some on shore wind up near the Rochdale area too. Does it mean they are offline if they just appear as black dots on the map?
[+] [-] nhecker|7 days ago|reply
A UI or terminology question: when 'Potential output' says it is 'Including curtailment', does this mean that it pretends that curtailment doesn't apply, or that it subtracts the curtailed power from the total available so that the total power shown is only the power actually transmitted (exported) to the grid? It's very likely that I'm just not familiar enough with the terms, but this wasn't immediately clear. My guess is the former meaning, although I can imagine it meaning either.
Regardless, this is incredibly neat, and I'd love to see this kind of data for the grid that serves me (Eastern Interconnect in the US) -- are you aware of any sites similar?
[+] [-] nasretdinov|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] acheong08|6 days ago|reply
[+] [-] turkeywelder|7 days ago|reply
How can we fix the curtailment problem? Storage nearer the turbines or just more transmission capacity generally? I presume we'd saturate storage pretty quickly so is it just a case of running more grid wiring from Scotland to say.. Manchester?
[+] [-] robhawkes|7 days ago|reply
The demand flexibility aspect is already being explored: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-to-make-plug-i...
[+] [-] ck2|7 days ago|reply
https://apnews.com/article/trump-offshore-wind-energy-climat...
[+] [-] elch|6 days ago|reply
UK: 0.442 USA: 0.148 India: 0.124 China: 0.097 Russia: 0.096
[+] [-] deterministic|6 days ago|reply
[+] [-] citrin_ru|6 days ago|reply
[+] [-] gotwaz|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] toomuchtodo|7 days ago|reply
(Robin, if there is a way to see this on your site, I could not find it, my apologies!)
[+] [-] wiredfool|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] ortusdux|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] robhawkes|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] plodman|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] Sarkie|7 days ago|reply
[+] [-] robhawkes|7 days ago|reply