First, what makes you think that "they probably would have failed"?
Second, he stole not just "an idea", he stole the code, he participated in their in-house discussions and effectively was spying over his future competitors, and most importantly he stole a lot of time - ConnectU founders were lured into believing that their product was moving along for a while.
Nobody pays $65M in a settlement for "stealing an idea". The fact that Facebook settled for such amount only means that ConnectU lawyers were able to prove some of these nasty things above.
Personally I'm very disgusted by this accident, I regret that jail time wasn't even a question. Something very similar happened to one of the startups I was involved in, but in that case it was an opposite spin: an "idea guy" who contributed nothing but the idea, used cofounding developers to build a prototype and then diluted them to almost zero even prior to A-round.
This undermines the entrepreneurial spirit. And the fact that you can get away with it (like Zuk did) in such visible manner is even worse, it's like O.J case for software.
Note that the stock:cash ratio was not disclosed. Depending on what it is, the payout could be significantly less (in the near future, at least; I am firmly in the camp that facebook is worth billions).
[+] [-] josefresco|17 years ago|reply
That's a nice pay day (for the lawyers too)
[+] [-] old-gregg|17 years ago|reply
Second, he stole not just "an idea", he stole the code, he participated in their in-house discussions and effectively was spying over his future competitors, and most importantly he stole a lot of time - ConnectU founders were lured into believing that their product was moving along for a while.
Nobody pays $65M in a settlement for "stealing an idea". The fact that Facebook settled for such amount only means that ConnectU lawyers were able to prove some of these nasty things above.
Personally I'm very disgusted by this accident, I regret that jail time wasn't even a question. Something very similar happened to one of the startups I was involved in, but in that case it was an opposite spin: an "idea guy" who contributed nothing but the idea, used cofounding developers to build a prototype and then diluted them to almost zero even prior to A-round.
This undermines the entrepreneurial spirit. And the fact that you can get away with it (like Zuk did) in such visible manner is even worse, it's like O.J case for software.
[+] [-] dpeq|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fallentimes|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] whacked_new|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] petercooper|17 years ago|reply
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/01/technology/01facebook.html...
[+] [-] unknown|17 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] aston|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jonknee|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jorgeortiz85|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kwamenum86|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] whacked_new|17 years ago|reply
Ok, downmodded, now does that mean yes, or no? A mere click is a bit too abstract.
[+] [-] cellis|17 years ago|reply
[+] [-] palish|17 years ago|reply
Because Facebook's valuation is completely stable and accurate.